On 07/31/2017 02:31 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:38:02AM +0000, Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#ifndef __DMA_STM32_DMAMUX_H
>>>>>> +#define __DMA_STM32_DMAMUX_H
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_STM32_DMAMUX)
>>>>>> +int stm32_dmamux_set_config(struct device *dev, void *route_data, u32 chan_id);
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do we need a custom API in this case?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This API is called by DMA when a slave is requested by client. DMA can work
>>>> without DMAMUX this API has been put in place to configure DMAMUX whether client
>>>> is requesting a DMAMUX Channel instead of a DMA one.
>>>
>>> You mean the dmaengine driver right?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. The API is mainly called by "device_config" through out STM32 DMA Driver
>> when a router is in place for client.
>> Please refer to Patch 4/5 on this set.
>
> Okay am thinking on why this can't be generic..? An optional router config
> callback?
>
I would have liked to answer there is a callback within engine but unfortunately
I didn't figure out one when I did my router's development. I've looked once
more but again I can't find how to map chanID and request line without custom API.��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������)�)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
