On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> FWIW, I would prefer the HAVE_MXS_DMA solution, this also makes it less
> likely that new SoC forget to add MXS_DMA support since it will be
> inside arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig.
I think that a cleaner solution would be to do like this:
--- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ config MV_XOR_V2
config MXS_DMA
bool "MXS DMA support"
- depends on SOC_IMX23 || SOC_IMX28 || SOC_IMX6Q || SOC_IMX6UL
+ depends on ARCH_MXS || ARCH_MXC
select STMP_DEVICE
select DMA_ENGINE
help
What do you think?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
