On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > FWIW, I would prefer the HAVE_MXS_DMA solution, this also makes it less > likely that new SoC forget to add MXS_DMA support since it will be > inside arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig. Thanks for your feedback. Will send the patches later today or tomorrow to implement the HAVE_MXS_DMA solution. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
