>> WARNING: Prefer devm_kcalloc over devm_kzalloc with multiply > For example. Also I just noticed some previous comment by Krzysztof that > pointed that out already. > > My suggestion: One sentence describing that the current situation is. Why do you find the sentence for the multiplication information inappropriate (or incomplete) at the moment? > Another sentence explaining why this is bad/undesirable. Which details do you miss here? > In this case, the output of the checkpatch script would come in handy. Its implementation of the check “ALLOC_WITH_MULTIPLY” considers only an other search pattern so far. * Do you find it worthwhile to add a prefix like “devm_” to the used regular expression? * Would like to improve any related scripts for the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software) a bit more? > With this, you avoid cramming every information into one long and > complicated sentence. Thanks for your feedback about other wording preferences. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
