Re: [PATCH 00/32] dmaengine: cleanups...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:24:06PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> This series attempts to do few cleanup for drivers. My aim was to fix irq
>> cleanup but on the way found few more things to be fixed as well.
>>  o explicitly freeup irq: Many drivers nowadays use devm variant for
>>    requesting irq, which is fine from cleanup POV, but on remove you leave irq
>>    enabled and able to fire. This can lead to nasty races, so better idea is
>>    to explicitly freeup.
>>  o same situation is with tasklets. They need to be killed before we exit,
>>    so that has been fixed too
>>  o while at it noticed few drivers still set .owner, removed them as well.
>>  o also fixed few sparse complaints
>
> Merging this now with the ACKs and changes as discussed

Hi Vinod,

I thought that we agreed that commit "dmaengine: pxa_dma: implement
device_synchronize" superseeded "dmaengine: pxa_dm: explicitly freeup irq" which
wasn't necessary anymore.

Yet I see it in your next tree. Can you tell me what is happening ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux