On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:12:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Martin Sperl <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 20.04.2016 08:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:29 PM, <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> From: Martin Sperl <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Use platform_get_irq_byname to allow for correct mapping of > >>> interrupts to dma channels. > >>> > >>> The currently implemented device tree is unfortunately > >>> implemented with the wrong assumption, that each dma-channel > >>> has its own dma channel, but dma-irq 11 is handling > >>> dma-channel 11-14 and dma-irq 12 is actually a "catch all" > >>> interrupt. > >>> > >>> So here we use the byname variant and require that interrupts > >>> are explicitly named via the interrupts-name property in the > >> > >> interrupt-names well spotted > > > > Vinod has just merged this patch - do you want me to submit another > > Yeah, that's how I noticed by accident :-) > > > to correct those? > > For the commit message it's indeed too late. For the error message in the > code, yes please. I can drop the branch -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
