On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:29 PM, <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Martin Sperl <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Use platform_get_irq_byname to allow for correct mapping of
> interrupts to dma channels.
>
> The currently implemented device tree is unfortunately
> implemented with the wrong assumption, that each dma-channel
> has its own dma channel, but dma-irq 11 is handling
> dma-channel 11-14 and dma-irq 12 is actually a "catch all"
> interrupt.
>
> So here we use the byname variant and require that interrupts
> are explicitly named via the interrupts-name property in the
interrupt-names
> device tree.
>
> The use of shared interrupts is also implemented.
You're not explicitly looking for "dma-shared-all" for that?
You might as well just declare a single unnamed interrupt in the bindings.
> + /* legacy device tree case handling */
> + dev_warn_once(&pdev->dev,
> + "missing interrupts-names property in device tree - legacy interpretation is used");
interrupt-names
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
