Re: [PATCH 1/6] dma: rcar-dma: add wait after stopping dma engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laurent,



On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Hamza,
>
> (With a question for Morimoto-san below)
>
> On Thursday 15 October 2015 18:08:56 Hamza Farooq wrote:
>> Hi Laurent,
>>
>> Thank you for the review. Please see my comments below. Also please let me
>> know if this code needs to be fixed on somewhat urgent basis since I am a
>> little occupied with few other tasks. I'd try to prioritize it then
>
> I don't think this is urgent, so no worries.
>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 29 September 2015 22:44:43 hamzahfrq.sub@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >> From: Muhammad Hamza Farooq <mfarooq@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> DMA engine does not stop instantaneously when transaction is going on
>> >> (see datasheet). Wait has been added
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Hamza Farooq <mfarooq@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >>  drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> >>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
>> >> index 7820d07..2b28291 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c
>> >> @@ -716,14 +716,38 @@ static int rcar_dmac_fill_hwdesc(struct
>> >> rcar_dmac_chan *chan,
>> >> /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>  * Stop and reset
>> >>  */
>> >>
>> >> +#define NR_READS_TO_WAIT 5 /* number of times to check if DE = 0 */
>> >> +static inline int rcar_dmac_wait_stop(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan)
>> >> +{
>> >> +     unsigned int i = 0;
>> >> +
>> >> +     do {
>> >> +             u32 chcr = rcar_dmac_chan_read(chan, RCAR_DMACHCR);
>> >> +
>> >> +             if (!(chcr & RCAR_DMACHCR_DE))
>> >> +                     return 0;
>> >> +             cpu_relax();
>> >> +             dev_dbg(chan->chan.device->dev, "DMA xfer couldn't be
>> >> stopped");
>> >>
>> > Would it make sense to move the message out of the loop and use dev_err()
>> > ? It seems like a pretty serious error.
>>
>> It happens quite often so dev_err might be too noisy. After couple
>> attempts (1-3) it stops so I think it is better to not make it dev_err
>
> That's why I mentioned moving it outside of the loop and only printing it when
> the DMA channel doesn't stop.

I don't think it is a good idea to notify the user again and again
about it, specially when it is handled by this patch. It occurs quite
a lot (for me, a lot means around 10 times for a data transfer of 7 MB
over sh-sci at 150 kbps)

>
>> >> +     } while (++i < NR_READS_TO_WAIT);
>> >
>> > How long does the DMA engine typically need to stop ? Is there a safe
>> > upper bound ?
>>
>> I have tested it many times. The highest number of retries was 3 which
>> occurred not very frequently. Normally it is 1-2
>
> Morimoto-san, could you check with the hardware team if there's a worst case
> guarantee regarding how long the channel could take to stop ?
>
>> >> -static void rcar_dmac_chan_halt(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan)
>> >> +     return -EBUSY;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/* Called with chan lock held */
>> >> +static int rcar_dmac_chan_halt(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan)
>> >>  {
>> >> -     u32 chcr = rcar_dmac_chan_read(chan, RCAR_DMACHCR);
>> >> +     u32 chcr;
>> >> +     int ret;
>> >>
>> >> +     chcr = rcar_dmac_chan_read(chan, RCAR_DMACHCR);
>> >>       chcr &= ~(RCAR_DMACHCR_DSE | RCAR_DMACHCR_DSIE | RCAR_DMACHCR_IE |
>> >>                 RCAR_DMACHCR_TE | RCAR_DMACHCR_DE);
>> >>       rcar_dmac_chan_write(chan, RCAR_DMACHCR, chcr);
>> >> +     ret = rcar_dmac_wait_stop(chan);
>> >
>> > As the rcar_dmac_wait_stop() function is used here only I'd inline the
>> > code directly.
>>
>> It is used in DMA_PAUSE operation as well
>
> Let's resolve the DMA pause issue and then decide :-)
>
>> >> +
>> >> +     WARN_ON(ret < 0);
>> >
>> > If you use dev_err() instead of dev_dbg() above you could remove the
>> > WARN_on.
>>
>> see comment about dev_err above
>>
>> >> +
>> >> +     return ret;
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>  static void rcar_dmac_chan_reinit(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan)
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>

Best,
Hamza
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux