Hi Laurent, Thank you for the review. Please see my comments below. Also please let me know if this code needs to be fixed on somewhat urgent basis since I am a little occupied with few other tasks. I'd try to prioritize it then Best regards, Hamza On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Muhammad, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Tuesday 29 September 2015 22:44:43 hamzahfrq.sub@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Muhammad Hamza Farooq <mfarooq@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> DMA engine does not stop instantaneously when transaction is going on >> (see datasheet). Wait has been added >> >> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Hamza Farooq <mfarooq@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c >> index 7820d07..2b28291 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c >> +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c >> @@ -716,14 +716,38 @@ static int rcar_dmac_fill_hwdesc(struct rcar_dmac_chan >> *chan, /* >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> * Stop and reset >> */ >> +#define NR_READS_TO_WAIT 5 /* number of times to check if DE = 0 */ >> +static inline int rcar_dmac_wait_stop(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan) >> +{ >> + unsigned int i = 0; >> + >> + do { >> + u32 chcr = rcar_dmac_chan_read(chan, RCAR_DMACHCR); >> + >> + if (!(chcr & RCAR_DMACHCR_DE)) >> + return 0; >> + cpu_relax(); >> + dev_dbg(chan->chan.device->dev, "DMA xfer couldn't be stopped"); > > Would it make sense to move the message out of the loop and use dev_err() ? It > seems like a pretty serious error. It happens quite often so dev_err might be too noisy. After couple attempts (1-3) it stops so I think it is better to not make it dev_err > >> + } while (++i < NR_READS_TO_WAIT); > > How long does the DMA engine typically need to stop ? Is there a safe upper > bound ? I have tested it many times. The highest number of retries was 3 which occurred not very frequently. Normally it is 1-2 > >> -static void rcar_dmac_chan_halt(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan) >> + return -EBUSY; >> +} >> + >> +/* Called with chan lock held */ >> +static int rcar_dmac_chan_halt(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan) >> { >> - u32 chcr = rcar_dmac_chan_read(chan, RCAR_DMACHCR); >> + u32 chcr; >> + int ret; >> >> + chcr = rcar_dmac_chan_read(chan, RCAR_DMACHCR); >> chcr &= ~(RCAR_DMACHCR_DSE | RCAR_DMACHCR_DSIE | RCAR_DMACHCR_IE | >> RCAR_DMACHCR_TE | RCAR_DMACHCR_DE); >> rcar_dmac_chan_write(chan, RCAR_DMACHCR, chcr); >> + ret = rcar_dmac_wait_stop(chan); > > As the rcar_dmac_wait_stop() function is used here only I'd inline the code > directly. It is used in DMA_PAUSE operation as well > >> + >> + WARN_ON(ret < 0); > > If you use dev_err() instead of dev_dbg() above you could remove the WARN_on. see comment about dev_err above > >> + >> + return ret; >> } >> >> static void rcar_dmac_chan_reinit(struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan) > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html