Re: [PATCH] dma: ti-dma-crossbar: Fix checking return value of devm_ioremap_resource

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2015-08-05 11:20 GMT+08:00 Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:13:19PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> devm_ioremap_resource returns ERR_PTR on failure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 7 ++-----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> index 24f5ca2..5e261d1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> @@ -139,12 +139,9 @@ static int ti_dma_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>               xbar->safe_val = (u16)safe_val;
>>
>>       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> -     if (!res)
>> -             return -ENODEV;
> and why remove this check?
>
> and is is not documented why you removed this

The checking is done in devm_ioremap_resource(), that is the usually way
to use devm_ioremap_resource().
I think it's very common in kernel code, so I didn't document it in commit log.

So should I send v2 to update the commit?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux