On 24/07/2015 07:30, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:51:28AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
Yes for dmaengine drivers I do ask this question which typically ends up in
driver invoking devm_irq_free() in driver's remove callback
IMHO don't think devm irq calls are very useful, they do make stuff
complicate
Would it be better then to just go back to request_irq (or whatever is
appropriate in this case). It would seem that the devm property can never
be relied on, so there is no point to use it.
Yes I do think that is right way in this case
Hmm, OK, I will drop the patch I submitted removing the explicit
devm_free_irq() call and send a new one which stops using the devm IRQ
functions, and kills the tasklets.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html