On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:51:28AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > Yes for dmaengine drivers I do ask this question which typically ends up in > > > driver invoking devm_irq_free() in driver's remove callback > > > > > > IMHO don't think devm irq calls are very useful, they do make stuff > > > complicate > > > > Would it be better then to just go back to request_irq (or whatever is > > appropriate in this case). It would seem that the devm property can never > > be relied on, so there is no point to use it. > > Yes I do think that is right way in this case Thanks for your help. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
