Re: [PATCH] dma: pch_dma: Fix Kconfig dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 12:43 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> On Mon, 19 May 2014 11:34:53 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 16:52 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Le Friday 16 May 2014 à 17:30 +0300, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
> > > > X86_32 is not what you are thinking.
> > > 
> > > Can you please be more specific / less cryptic?
> > 
> > You narrow requirements to X86_32, meanwhile X86 selects much more even
> > in 32bits case.
> 
> Why should I care about what X86 selects?
> 
> > I think you probably want to use X86 && !64BIT.
> 
> As I read arch/x86/Kconfig, X86 && !64BIT is always the same as X86_32,
> so that's more complex and doesn't buy us anything.
> 
> In other words, I still do not understand what you are trying to tell
> me. If you have concrete examples of why depending on X86_32 would be
> wrong, please show them. I'd be kind of surprised though, given that
> 115 Kconfig entries already depend on X86_32.

Oh, my bad. Totally mess this thing with X86_X32. Sorry for noise.


-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux