On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:59:13PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > On 04/16/2014 11:09 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:38:10AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > >>>> It might add to the readability of the drivers, but for the current > >>>> case, I don't think it's really necessary. > >>> That is because you are maintaining the current descriptors in chain_running. If > >>> we use above method then you dont need to use this, right? > >> > >> Jup, but that would result in a rewrite of larger parts of the code. The > >> concept of hot-linking the two list so there's only one resulting list > >> of currently active descriptors is built-in deeply into the driver's > >> concept. > > Ah I suspected so :) > > > > I think for now this is fine you can perhaps upgrade this later :) > > So, do you want me to resend with the minor dma_set_residue() change? Yes please... -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
