Re: [PATCH RESEND] dma: mmp_pdma: add support for residue reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/16/2014 11:09 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:38:10AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>>> It might add to the readability of the drivers, but for the current
>>>> case, I don't think it's really necessary.
>>> That is because you are maintaining the current descriptors in chain_running. If
>>> we use above method then you dont need to use this, right?
>>
>> Jup, but that would result in a rewrite of larger parts of the code. The
>> concept of hot-linking the two list so there's only one resulting list
>> of currently active descriptors is built-in deeply into the driver's
>> concept.
> Ah I suspected so :)
> 
> I think for now this is fine you can perhaps upgrade this later :)

So, do you want me to resend with the minor dma_set_residue() change?


Thanks,
Daniel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux