Re: [PATCH v2 09/22] multipathd: split do_checker_path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nit: the subject should refer to "do_check_path".
Also, the word "split" is somewhat confusing as you've been using it 
for actually splitting one function into two elsewhere in this set.

Perhaps just call the patch "rename do_check_path to
update_path_state".

On Thu, 2024-09-12 at 17:49 -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> Move the code that starts the path checker from do_check_path() into
> check_path(), rename the remainder of do_check_path() to
> update_path_state() and call that from check_path().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  multipathd/main.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/multipathd/main.c b/multipathd/main.c
> index 16c0531e..9319751e 100644
> --- a/multipathd/main.c
> +++ b/multipathd/main.c
> @@ -2396,7 +2396,7 @@ enum check_path_return {
>  };
>  
>  static int
> -do_check_path (struct vectors * vecs, struct path * pp)
> +update_path_state (struct vectors * vecs, struct path * pp)
>  {
>  	int newstate;
>  	int new_path_up = 0;
> @@ -2414,12 +2414,6 @@ do_check_path (struct vectors * vecs, struct
> path * pp)
>  	marginal_pathgroups = conf->marginal_pathgroups;
>  	put_multipath_config(conf);
>  
> -	if (pp->checkint == CHECKINT_UNDEF) {
> -		condlog(0, "%s: BUG: checkint is not set", pp->dev);
> -		pp->checkint = checkint;
> -	};
> -
> -	start_path_check(pp);
>  	newstate = get_new_state(pp);
>  	if (newstate == PATH_WILD || newstate == PATH_UNCHECKED)
>  		return CHECK_PATH_SKIPPED;
> @@ -2639,7 +2633,7 @@ check_path (struct vectors * vecs, struct path
> * pp, unsigned int ticks,
>  	    time_t start_secs)
>  {
>  	int r;
> -	unsigned int adjust_int, max_checkint;
> +	unsigned int adjust_int, checkint, max_checkint;
>  	struct config *conf;
>  	time_t next_idx, goal_idx;
>  
> @@ -2652,14 +2646,21 @@ check_path (struct vectors * vecs, struct
> path * pp, unsigned int ticks,
>  		return CHECK_PATH_SKIPPED;
>  
>  	conf = get_multipath_config();
> +	checkint = conf->checkint;
>  	max_checkint = conf->max_checkint;
>  	adjust_int = conf->adjust_int;
>  	put_multipath_config(conf);
>  
> -	r = do_check_path(vecs, pp);
> +	if (pp->checkint == CHECKINT_UNDEF) {
> +		condlog(0, "%s: BUG: checkint is not set", pp->dev);
> +		pp->checkint = checkint;
> +	}
> +
> +	start_path_check(pp);
> +	r = update_path_state(vecs, pp);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * do_check_path() removed or orphaned the path.
> +	 * update_path() removed or orphaned the path.

Nit: update_path() is introduced in the follow-up patch.
Should this be update_path_state()?

Martin


>  	 */
>  	if (r == CHECK_PATH_REMOVED || !pp->mpp)
>  		return r;






[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux