Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] Document dm-integrity default values.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 07:23:34AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 12:06:03PM -0700, Russell Harmon wrote:
> >> Specifically:
> >>   interleave_sectors = 32768
> >>   buffer_sectors = 128
> >>   block_size = 512
> >>   journal_watermark = 50
> >>   commit_time = 10000
> >
> > Your patch description duplicates the diff content below. Please write
> > in a mood that evocates curiosity to read the diff (and make sure it is
> > also imperative).
> 
> Bagas, this is a typo-fix patch.  It does not need to be nitpicked into
> the ground.
> 
> Russell, Bagas is inadvertently teaching you another lesson about the
> kernel development community; it includes a certain number of people who
> like to push contributors around with authoritative-sounding messages.
> These people do not always need to be listened to.

OK, thanks for the tip again!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux