Re: [PATCH] Improve the dm-integrity documentation.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:07 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 6/4/23 03:15, Russell Harmon wrote:
> > Thanks for taking a look. Here's the multi-patch series plus the changes
> > you suggested.
> >
> >
>
> This is v2, right? Next reroll, remember to version your patches
> (pass -v to git-format-patch(1)).

Will do.

> Also, I don't see description (that would be commit message
> once applied by jon) in all patches on this series. I hope you
> have a time reading Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> so that trivial mistakes like this shouldn't happen again. In
> any case, when preparing patch series, always add cover letter
> by passing --cover-letter to git-format-patch(1) then edit the
> generated template (look for 0000-*-cover-letter.patch).

My "thanks for taking a look" email was the cover letter.

Interesting that the commit message didn't go through in the body,
they're each one line and were moved to the subject line. I'll try
again and add a little more description.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux