Re: [PATCH] announcing the dm-update target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:38:31AM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> There seems to be a general industry movement towards edge, attestation,
> trusted boot, nested systems, confidential computing, containers,
> <insert your favourite buzzwords> etc. and I think this type of
> device-mapper target might play a useful role as one of the low-level
> components involved in building up support for some of those scenarios.
> (Just as we recently began adding support for attestation.)

For example, I think we've already made good progress towards
standardising the industry around dm-verity.  (At least, I keep
on encountering it being used in various different places, rather
than people attempting to develop their own version.)  We extended
that concept with dm-integrity but I'm less sure about how widely
that has been taken up so far.

For edge systems needing unattended remote reliable updates, our
high-level challenge here is: Can we together develop a decent and
efficient solution for OTA updates that the industry will be happy to
standardise around?

Alasdair

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux