Re: [PATCH] announcing the dm-update target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 04:07:21PM -0800, Akilesh Kailash wrote:
> Why not extend dm-snapshot; in that way you can have the existing
> kernel COW format + support compression.

In short, this is quite a focussed requirement and it doesn't seem worth
compromising on the goals by attempting to shoe-horn it into a framework
that was designed to fit around some quite different constraints twenty
years ago.

> I understand this for read-only but if dm-snapshot supports it,
> existing users  can have the
> compression feature if required.

I doubt that anyone wants to develop dm-snapshot any further.  It's only
really good for small short-term snapshots where performance and memory
usage don't matter.  The more-sophisticated thin provisioning approach
replaced it.

> Also, I am curious what are the other real world use case here apart
> from Android ?

There seems to be a general industry movement towards edge, attestation,
trusted boot, nested systems, confidential computing, containers,
<insert your favourite buzzwords> etc. and I think this type of
device-mapper target might play a useful role as one of the low-level
components involved in building up support for some of those scenarios.
(Just as we recently began adding support for attestation.)
 
Alasdair

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux