Hi Christoph, > On 14 Oct 2021, at 07:28, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:10:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> I wondered about adding a helper for looking at the size in byte units >> to avoid the SECTOR_SHIFT shifts in various places. But given that >> I could not come up with a good name and block devices fundamentally >> work in sector size granularity I decided against that. > > So it seems like the biggest review feedback is that we should have > such a helper. I think the bdev_size name is the worst as size does > not imply a particular unit. bdev_nr_bytes is a little better but I'm > not too happy. Any other suggestions or strong opinions? bdev_byte_size() would seem to address your concerns? bdev_nr_bytes() would work though - it is analogous to bdev_nr_sectors() after all. No strong opinion here but I do agree with you that bdev_size() is a bad choice for sure. It is bound to cause bugs down the line when people forget what unit it is in. Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <anton at tuxera.com> (replace at with @) Lead in File System Development, Tuxera Inc., http://www.tuxera.com/ Linux NTFS maintainer -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
