Re: [PATCH] multipathd: avoid crash in uevent_cleanup()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 18:48 +0800, lixiaokeng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/2/3 4:52, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > did this fix your "crash on exit" issue?
> 
> Unfortunately, the issue is not solved.
> 
> There will be some different coredump stack.
> 
> 0.8.5 (I'm not sure there are only two stacks in 0.8.5)
> First stack:
> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> #0  0x00007f59a0109647 in ?? ()
> [Current thread is 1 (LWP 1997690)]
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x00007f59a0109647 in ?? ()
> #1  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> (gdb) info threads
>   Id   Target Id         Frame
> * 1    LWP 1997690       0x00007f59a0109647 in ?? ()
>   2    LWP 1996840       0x00007f59a0531de7 in ?? ()
>   3    LWP 1997692       0x00007f59a0109647 in ?? ()
>   4    LWP 1996857       0x00007f59a020d169 in ?? ()
> 
> Second stack:
> #0  0x0000ffffb6118f4c in aarch64_fallback_frame_state
> (context=0xffffb523f200, context=0xffffb523f200, fs=0xffffb523e700)
> at ./md-unwind-support.h:74
> #1  uw_frame_state_for (context=context@entry=0xffffb523f200, 
> fs=fs@entry=0xffffb523e700) at ../../../libgcc/unwind-dw2.c:1257
> #2  0x0000ffffb6119ef4 in _Unwind_ForcedUnwind_Phase2
> (exc=exc@entry=0xffffb52403b0, context=context@entry=0xffffb523f200)
> at ../../../libgcc/unwind.inc:155
> #3  0x0000ffffb611a284 in _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (exc=0xffffb52403b0, 
> stop=stop@entry=0xffffb64846c0 <unwind_stop>,
> stop_argument=0xffffb523f630) at ../../../libgcc/unwind.inc:207
> #4  0x0000ffffb6484860 in __GI___pthread_unwind (buf=<optimized out>)
> at unwind.c:121
> #5  0x0000ffffb6482d08 in __do_cancel () at pthreadP.h:304
> #6  __GI___pthread_testcancel () at pthread_testcancel.c:26
> #7  0x0000ffffb5c528e8 in ?? ()
> 

Please check your glibc and gcc versions. Google turns up some general
issues with pthread_cancel() and certain library versions, especially
on ARM. There's a chance that this isn't a multipath-tools bug after
all.

https://www.google.com/search?q=SIGSEGV+_Unwind_ForcedUnwind_Phase2

You could also try to compile with clang and see if the error goes
away.

> If exit() before all pthread_cancel in child of 0.7.7, there is no
> any crash.

What do you mean with "exit() before all pthread_cancel"? If this
happens on pthread_cancel(), and you don't call that function, this
would actually be expected.

Regards,
Martin

> So I believe there are many races in thread cancel but I don't know
> how it comes.



> 
> Regards,
> Lixiaokeng
> 



--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux