Re: [PATCH] libmultipath: check if adopt_path() really added current path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 17:42 +0800, lixiaokeng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/2/3 16:14, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > Is this also a Tested-by:? 
> > IOW, did it fix your issue?
> 
> Yes, it solves the crash.But there is an other issue.
> 
> multipath.conf
> defaults {
>         find_multipaths no
> }
> 
> [root@localhost coredump]# multipathd add path sdb
> fail
> [root@localhost coredump]# multipath -ll
> [root@localhost coredump]# multipathd add path sdb
> ok
> [root@localhost coredump]# multipath -ll
> 0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_drive-scsi0-0-0-1 dm-3 QEMU,QEMU HARDDISK
> size=1.0G features='0' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
> `-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=1 status=enabled
>   `- 2:0:0:1 sdb 8:16 active ready running
> 
> I add local path twice. The first fails while the second
> succeeds.

More details please. What exactly were you doing? Was this a regression
caused by my patch? Please provide multipathd -v3 logs.

Also, you're aware that "find_multipaths no" is discouraged?
It leads to inconsistent behavior between multipath and multipathd.

Regards,
Martin



--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel





[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux