On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 14:24 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > pathcountgr() is never used except by pathcount(), and neither is the > special case for PATH_WILD. Simplify this and make one function that > is > used by both pathcount() and count_active_paths(). This will be used > again in a future patch. > > Also use count_active_paths() in mpath_persist. The patch looks correct. I had thought about something like it as well when I first introduced count_active_paths(). But count_active_paths() is used a *lot*, and often in critical situations. I wonder whether it deserves an optimized version. The compiler can surely optimize better with two constant expressions than with the additional for-loop over an array with variable size. That's why back then I decided against implementing it as a special case of a generic function. I actually considered inlining count_active_paths(). It's hard to quantify the effect, and I haven't done any benchmarks. But still, can we perhaps keep the optimized version of count_active_paths() itself? Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
