On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 14:24 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > kpartx/kpartx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kpartx/kpartx.c b/kpartx/kpartx.c > index c24ad6d9..653ce0c8 100644 > --- a/kpartx/kpartx.c > +++ b/kpartx/kpartx.c > @@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ struct block { > /* blknr is always in 512 byte blocks */ > char * > getblock (int fd, unsigned int blknr) { > - unsigned int secsz = get_sector_size(fd); > + int secsz = get_sector_size(fd); > unsigned int blks_per_sec = secsz / 512; > unsigned int secnr = blknr / blks_per_sec; > unsigned int blk_off = (blknr % blks_per_sec) * 512; I was wondering why I didn't see this one. Turns out that it occurs only for 32bit compilations. It looks like sort of an overzealous compiler warning to me, as it's only about a "!=" comparison that can hardly produce a wrong or unexpected result. Btw, not that it would matter much, but the value of he BLKSSZGET ioctl is actually unsigned. Anyway, ack. -- Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel