On 6/29/20 10:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:43:13PM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: >> The only difference in block_get_rq and block_bio was the last param >> passed __entry->nr_sector & bio->bi_iter.bi_size respectively. Since >> that is not the case anymore replace block_get_rq class with block_bio >> for block_getrq and block_sleeprq events, also adjust the code to handle >> null bio case in block_bio. > To me it seems like keeping the NULL bio case separate actually is a > little simpler.. > > Keeping it separate will have an extra event class and related event(s) for only handling null bio case. Also the block_get_rq class uses 4 comparisons with ?:. This patch reduces it to only one comparison in fast path. With above explanation does it make sense to get rid of the blk_get_rq ? -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
