On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:56:22AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > Index: linux-2.6/crypto/cryptd.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/cryptd.c 2020-06-29 16:03:07.346417000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/cryptd.c 2020-06-30 15:49:04.206417000 +0200 > > @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static inline void cryptd_check_internal > > > > *type |= algt->type & CRYPTO_ALG_INTERNAL; > > *mask |= algt->mask & CRYPTO_ALG_INTERNAL; > > + *mask |= algt->mask & CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS; > > } > > This needs to use the correct logic (crypto_alg_inherited_mask) to decide which > inherited flags to set in 'mask'. I added "*mask |= crypto_alg_inherited_mask(algt->type, algt->mask);" there. > > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/adiantum.c 2020-06-29 16:03:07.346417000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/adiantum.c 2020-06-29 16:03:07.346417000 +0200 > > @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static int adiantum_create(struct crypto > > if ((algt->type ^ CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_SKCIPHER) & algt->mask) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - mask = crypto_requires_sync(algt->type, algt->mask); > > + mask = crypto_alg_inherited_mask(algt->type, algt->mask); > > > > inst = kzalloc(sizeof(*inst) + sizeof(*ictx), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!inst) > > This is still missing setting the flags correctly on the template instance being > constructed. The flags need to be inherited from all "inner" algorithms: > > inst->alg.base.cra_flags = (streamcipher_alg->base.cra_flags | > blockcipher_alg->cra_flags | > hash_alg->base.cra_flags) & > CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS; > > If we don't do that, the template instance may allocate memory but not have > CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY set. OK > > Index: linux-2.6/crypto/pcrypt.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/pcrypt.c 2020-06-29 16:03:07.346417000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/pcrypt.c 2020-06-30 15:47:32.776417000 +0200 > > @@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ static int pcrypt_create_aead(struct cry > > if (err) > > goto err_free_inst; > > > > - inst->alg.base.cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC; > > + inst->alg.base.cra_flags = > > + CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC | > > + (alg->base.cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS); > > > > inst->alg.ivsize = crypto_aead_alg_ivsize(alg); > > inst->alg.maxauthsize = crypto_aead_alg_maxauthsize(alg); What's wrong with this? > And this is still missing setting the mask: > > diff --git a/crypto/pcrypt.c b/crypto/pcrypt.c > index 7240e8bbdebb..643f7f1cc91c 100644 > --- a/crypto/pcrypt.c > +++ b/crypto/pcrypt.c > @@ -232,12 +232,15 @@ static int pcrypt_create_aead(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb, > struct crypto_attr_type *algt; > struct aead_instance *inst; > struct aead_alg *alg; > + u32 mask; > int err; > > algt = crypto_get_attr_type(tb); > if (IS_ERR(algt)) > return PTR_ERR(algt); > > + mask = crypto_alg_inherited_mask(algt->type, algt->mask); > + > inst = kzalloc(sizeof(*inst) + sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!inst) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -254,7 +257,7 @@ static int pcrypt_create_aead(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb, > goto err_free_inst; > > err = crypto_grab_aead(&ctx->spawn, aead_crypto_instance(inst), > - crypto_attr_alg_name(tb[1]), 0, 0); > + crypto_attr_alg_name(tb[1]), 0, mask); > if (err) > goto err_free_inst; > I added "mask" there - but there is still a "mask" argument that is unused - is it a bug to have two "mask" variables? > Can you please think logically about what you're trying to accomplish? I am not an expert in crypto code. > In particular, if someone requests an algorithm that doesn't allocate memory > (which is indicated by type=0, mask=CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY), that request > needs to be honored. > > - Eric Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
