On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:56:22AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Index: linux-2.6/crypto/cryptd.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/cryptd.c 2020-06-29 16:03:07.346417000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/cryptd.c 2020-06-30 15:49:04.206417000 +0200 > @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static inline void cryptd_check_internal > > *type |= algt->type & CRYPTO_ALG_INTERNAL; > *mask |= algt->mask & CRYPTO_ALG_INTERNAL; > + *mask |= algt->mask & CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS; > } This needs to use the correct logic (crypto_alg_inherited_mask) to decide which inherited flags to set in 'mask'. > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/adiantum.c 2020-06-29 16:03:07.346417000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/adiantum.c 2020-06-29 16:03:07.346417000 +0200 > @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static int adiantum_create(struct crypto > if ((algt->type ^ CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_SKCIPHER) & algt->mask) > return -EINVAL; > > - mask = crypto_requires_sync(algt->type, algt->mask); > + mask = crypto_alg_inherited_mask(algt->type, algt->mask); > > inst = kzalloc(sizeof(*inst) + sizeof(*ictx), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!inst) This is still missing setting the flags correctly on the template instance being constructed. The flags need to be inherited from all "inner" algorithms: inst->alg.base.cra_flags = (streamcipher_alg->base.cra_flags | blockcipher_alg->cra_flags | hash_alg->base.cra_flags) & CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS; If we don't do that, the template instance may allocate memory but not have CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY set. > Index: linux-2.6/crypto/pcrypt.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/crypto/pcrypt.c 2020-06-29 16:03:07.346417000 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6/crypto/pcrypt.c 2020-06-30 15:47:32.776417000 +0200 > @@ -263,7 +263,9 @@ static int pcrypt_create_aead(struct cry > if (err) > goto err_free_inst; > > - inst->alg.base.cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC; > + inst->alg.base.cra_flags = > + CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC | > + (alg->base.cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_INHERITED_FLAGS); > > inst->alg.ivsize = crypto_aead_alg_ivsize(alg); > inst->alg.maxauthsize = crypto_aead_alg_maxauthsize(alg); And this is still missing setting the mask: diff --git a/crypto/pcrypt.c b/crypto/pcrypt.c index 7240e8bbdebb..643f7f1cc91c 100644 --- a/crypto/pcrypt.c +++ b/crypto/pcrypt.c @@ -232,12 +232,15 @@ static int pcrypt_create_aead(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb, struct crypto_attr_type *algt; struct aead_instance *inst; struct aead_alg *alg; + u32 mask; int err; algt = crypto_get_attr_type(tb); if (IS_ERR(algt)) return PTR_ERR(algt); + mask = crypto_alg_inherited_mask(algt->type, algt->mask); + inst = kzalloc(sizeof(*inst) + sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); if (!inst) return -ENOMEM; @@ -254,7 +257,7 @@ static int pcrypt_create_aead(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb, goto err_free_inst; err = crypto_grab_aead(&ctx->spawn, aead_crypto_instance(inst), - crypto_attr_alg_name(tb[1]), 0, 0); + crypto_attr_alg_name(tb[1]), 0, mask); if (err) goto err_free_inst; Can you please think logically about what you're trying to accomplish? In particular, if someone requests an algorithm that doesn't allocate memory (which is indicated by type=0, mask=CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY), that request needs to be honored. - Eric -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
