Re: dm: expose dm_copy_name_and_uuid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 06 2020 at 10:19pm -0500,
John Dorminy <jdorminy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I agree that adding uuid to all messages would be gross bloat, and a
> bad idea to apply everywhere.
> 
> I didn't actually realize that devices could be renamed with dmsetup.
> Thanks for pointing that out...

Also, device names can also be ridiculously long.  I really just don't
think logging the name instead of major:minor is a great idea... but I'm
open to target authors electing to log it _in addition to_
dm_device_name() -- but I wouldn't want to go as far as imposing that
constraint with code...

Or would I? ;)

Create dm_pretty_device_name() that logs: "major:minor (name)" ?

Mike

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux