On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:24:33AM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > In other words, NEVER report name/uuid without ALSO still reporting > dm_device_name alongside it. The reason we only log dm_device_name() is because it is the minimum necessary to uniquely identify the device and tie together all the messages relating to it. Adding name/uuid to every message would make log messages unduly long. We could offer an in-kernel option to log all setting and changing of device names and uuids in the dm core, though I might argue that that would just be covering up inadaquate logging in the userspace tools making the changes. Storage-logger offers a compromise that records it all from the generated uevents. Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel