On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:59 PM Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Applied (with two small fixes), thanks!
Karel, Mikulas,
ts/blkid/low-probe started to fail on sparc64 with this patch:
blkid: superblocks probing: [97] xfs-log ... OK
blkid: superblocks probing: [98] xfs ...
FAILED (blkid/low-probe-xfs)
but is "OK" on x86_64.
$ diff -u expected/blkid/low-probe-xfs output/blkid/low-probe-xfs
--- expected/blkid/low-probe-xfs 2019-09-03 12:45:18.779505561 +0300
+++ output/blkid/low-probe-xfs 2019-09-03 14:35:41.569815684 +0300
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-ID_FS_BLOCK_SIZE=512
+ID_FS_BLOCK_SIZE=131072
ID_FS_LABEL=test-xfs
ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=test-xfs
ID_FS_TYPE=xfs
$ md5sum output/blkid/images-fs/xfs.img
c4a59d4039b5ed5557e8502ca2906373 output/blkid/images-fs/xfs.img
(md5 is the same as on x86_64 test machine)
You can use gcc202 sparc64 machine from gcc compile farm for the test.
PS: can someone regenerate xfs.img(xz) with more recent XFS filesystem version?
$ xfs_info output/blkid/images-fs/xfs.img
xfs_info: V1 inodes unsupported. Please try an older xfsprogs.
$ dpkg -l xfsprogs
ii xfsprogs 5.0.0-1 sparc64 Utilities for managing
the XFS filesystem
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
