On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 03:36:46PM +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:59 PM Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Applied (with two small fixes), thanks!
>
> Karel, Mikulas,
>
> ts/blkid/low-probe started to fail on sparc64 with this patch:
>
> blkid: superblocks probing: [97] xfs-log ... OK
> blkid: superblocks probing: [98] xfs ...
> FAILED (blkid/low-probe-xfs)
>
> but is "OK" on x86_64.
>
> $ diff -u expected/blkid/low-probe-xfs output/blkid/low-probe-xfs
> --- expected/blkid/low-probe-xfs 2019-09-03 12:45:18.779505561 +0300
> +++ output/blkid/low-probe-xfs 2019-09-03 14:35:41.569815684 +0300
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -ID_FS_BLOCK_SIZE=512
> +ID_FS_BLOCK_SIZE=131072
blkid_probe_set_block_size(pr, xs->sb_sectsize * 256);
be16_to_cpu() is missing here :-) I'll fix it.
Karel
> ID_FS_LABEL=test-xfs
> ID_FS_LABEL_ENC=test-xfs
> ID_FS_TYPE=xfs
>
> $ md5sum output/blkid/images-fs/xfs.img
> c4a59d4039b5ed5557e8502ca2906373 output/blkid/images-fs/xfs.img
>
> (md5 is the same as on x86_64 test machine)
>
> You can use gcc202 sparc64 machine from gcc compile farm for the test.
>
> PS: can someone regenerate xfs.img(xz) with more recent XFS filesystem version?
>
> $ xfs_info output/blkid/images-fs/xfs.img
> xfs_info: V1 inodes unsupported. Please try an older xfsprogs.
or we need to add another xfs image. I guess we want to support all
versions.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
