Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] md raid0/linear: Introduce new array state 'broken'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 8/16/19 3:40 PM, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
+static bool linear_is_missing_dev(struct mddev *mddev)
+{
+	struct md_rdev *rdev;
+	static int already_missing;
+	int def_disks, work_disks = 0;
+
+	def_disks = mddev->raid_disks;
+	rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev)
+		if (rdev->bdev->bd_disk->flags & GENHD_FL_UP)
+			work_disks++;
+
+	if (unlikely(def_disks - work_disks)) {

If my understanding is correct, after enter the branch,

+		if (already_missing < (def_disks - work_disks)) {

the above is always true since already_missing should be '0', right?
If so, maybe the above checking is pointless.

+			already_missing = def_disks - work_disks;
+			pr_warn("md: %s: linear array has %d missing/failed members\n",
+				mdname(mddev), already_missing);
+		}
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	already_missing = 0;
+	return false;
+}
+.

I'd suggest something like, just FYI.

bool already_missing = false;
int missing_disks;

missing_disks = def_disks - work_disks;
if (unlikely(missing_disks)) {
	already_missing = true;
	pr_warn("md: %s: linear array has %d missing/failed members\n", mdname(mddev), missing_disks);
}
return already_missing;


Thanks,
Guoqing

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux