On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:42:00 +0300 Denis Efremov <efremov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch inlines bitmap_weight() call. It is better to say the patch "open codes" the bitmap_weight() call. > Thus, removing the BUG_ON, Why is that OK to do? I expect all the code size improvements are from doing this? > and 'longs to bits -> bits to longs' conversion by directly calling > hweight_long(). > > ./scripts/bloat-o-meter lib/memweight.o.old lib/memweight.o.new > add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-10 (-10) > Function old new delta > memweight 162 152 -10 > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
