On 2/19/19 5:17 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:28:19AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
With this patch applied test nvmeof-mp/002 fails as follows:
[ 694.700400] kernel BUG at lib/sg_pool.c:103!
[ 694.705932] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
[ 694.708297] CPU: 2 PID: 349 Comm: kworker/2:1H Tainted: G B 5.0.0-rc6-dbg+ #2
[ 694.711730] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
[ 694.715113] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
[ 694.716894] RIP: 0010:sg_alloc_table_chained+0xe5/0xf0
[ 694.758222] Call Trace:
[ 694.759645] nvme_rdma_queue_rq+0x2aa/0xcc0 [nvme_rdma]
[ 694.764915] blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0x2a5/0x4b0
[ 694.771779] blk_insert_cloned_request+0x11e/0x1c0
[ 694.778417] dm_mq_queue_rq+0x3d1/0x770
[ 694.793400] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x5fc/0xb10
[ 694.798386] blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2f7/0x300
[ 694.803180] __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xd6/0x180
[ 694.808933] blk_mq_run_work_fn+0x27/0x30
[ 694.810315] process_one_work+0x4f1/0xa40
[ 694.813178] worker_thread+0x67/0x5b0
[ 694.814487] kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
[ 694.819134] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
The code in sg_pool.c that triggers the BUG() statement is as follows:
int sg_alloc_table_chained(struct sg_table *table, int nents,
struct scatterlist *first_chunk)
{
int ret;
BUG_ON(!nents);
[ ... ]
Bart.
I can reproduce this issue("kernel BUG at lib/sg_pool.c:103") without mp-bvec patches,
so looks it isn't the fault of this patchset.
Thanks Ming for your feedback.
Jens, I don't see that issue with kernel v5.0-rc6. Does that mean that
the sg_pool BUG() is a regression in your for-next branch that predates
Ming's multi-page bvec patch series?
Thanks,
Bart.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
