Re: [PATCH V15 00/18] block: support multi-page bvec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/15/19 4:13 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patchset brings multi-page bvec into block layer:
> 
> 1) what is multi-page bvec?
> 
> Multipage bvecs means that one 'struct bio_bvec' can hold multiple pages
> which are physically contiguous instead of one single page used in linux
> kernel for long time.
> 
> 2) why is multi-page bvec introduced?
> 
> Kent proposed the idea[1] first. 
> 
> As system's RAM becomes much bigger than before, and huge page, transparent
> huge page and memory compaction are widely used, it is a bit easy now
> to see physically contiguous pages from fs in I/O. On the other hand, from
> block layer's view, it isn't necessary to store intermediate pages into bvec,
> and it is enough to just store the physicallly contiguous 'segment' in each
> io vector.
> 
> Also huge pages are being brought to filesystem and swap [2][6], we can
> do IO on a hugepage each time[3], which requires that one bio can transfer
> at least one huge page one time. Turns out it isn't flexiable to change
> BIO_MAX_PAGES simply[3][5]. Multipage bvec can fit in this case very well.
> As we saw, if CONFIG_THP_SWAP is enabled, BIO_MAX_PAGES can be configured
> as much bigger, such as 512, which requires at least two 4K pages for holding
> the bvec table.
> 
> With multi-page bvec:
> 
> - Inside block layer, both bio splitting and sg map can become more
> efficient than before by just traversing the physically contiguous
> 'segment' instead of each page.
> 
> - segment handling in block layer can be improved much in future since it
> should be quite easy to convert multipage bvec into segment easily. For
> example, we might just store segment in each bvec directly in future.
> 
> - bio size can be increased and it should improve some high-bandwidth IO
> case in theory[4].
> 
> - there is opportunity in future to improve memory footprint of bvecs. 
> 
> 3) how is multi-page bvec implemented in this patchset?
> 
> Patch 1 ~ 3 parpares for supporting multi-page bvec. 
> 
> Patches 4 ~ 14 implement multipage bvec in block layer:
> 
> 	- put all tricks into bvec/bio/rq iterators, and as far as
> 	drivers and fs use these standard iterators, they are happy
> 	with multipage bvec
> 
> 	- introduce bio_for_each_bvec() to iterate over multipage bvec for splitting
> 	bio and mapping sg
> 
> 	- keep current bio_for_each_segment*() to itereate over singlepage bvec and
> 	make sure current users won't be broken; especailly, convert to this
> 	new helper prototype in single patch 21 given it is bascially a mechanism
> 	conversion
> 
> 	- deal with iomap & xfs's sub-pagesize io vec in patch 13
> 
> 	- enalbe multipage bvec in patch 14 
> 
> Patch 15 redefines BIO_MAX_PAGES as 256.
> 
> Patch 16 documents usages of bio iterator helpers.
> 
> Patch 17~18 kills NO_SG_MERGE.
> 
> These patches can be found in the following git tree:
> 
> 	git:  https://github.com/ming1/linux.git  v5.0-blk_mp_bvec_v14
                                                                   ^^^

v15?

> Lots of test(blktest, xfstests, ltp io, ...) have been run with this patchset,
> and not see regression.
> 
> Thanks Christoph for reviewing the early version and providing very good
> suggestions, such as: introduce bio_init_with_vec_table(), remove another
> unnecessary helpers for cleanup and so on.
> 
> Thanks Chritoph and Omar for reviewing V10/V11/V12, and provides lots of
> helpful comments.

Applied, thanks Ming. Let's hope it sticks!

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux