On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > Mikulas Patoka wants to ensure that no fallback to lower order happens. I
> > think __GFP_NORETRY should work correctly in that case too and not fall
> > back.
> >
> >
> >
> > Allocating at a smaller order is a retry operation and should not
> > be attempted.
> >
> > If the caller does not want retries then respect that.
> >
> > GFP_NORETRY allows callers to ensure that only maximum order
> > allocations are attempted.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Index: linux/mm/slub.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/mm/slub.c
> > +++ linux/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
> > alloc_gfp = (alloc_gfp | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC) & ~(__GFP_RECLAIM|__GFP_NOFAIL);
> >
> > page = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
> > - if (unlikely(!page)) {
> > + if (unlikely(!page) && !(flags & __GFP_NORETRY)) {
> > oo = s->min;
> > alloc_gfp = flags;
> > /*
>
> No, this would hit NULL pointer dereference if page is NULL and
> __GFP_NORETRY is set. You want this:
>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c 2018-04-17 20:58:23.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c 2018-04-18 17:04:01.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1599,6 +1599,8 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
>
> page = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
> if (unlikely(!page)) {
> + if (flags & __GFP_NORETRY)
> + goto out;
> oo = s->min;
> alloc_gfp = flags;
> /*
>
I don't see the connection between the max order, which can be influenced
by userspace with slub_min_objects, slub_min_order, etc, and specifying
__GFP_NORETRY which means try to reclaim and free memory but don't loop.
If I force a slab cache to try a max order of 9 for hugepages as a best
effort, why does __GFP_NORETRY suddenly mean I won't fallback to
oo_order(s->min)?
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
