Re: [PATCH] multipath-tools: Makefile: Respect standard toolchain related envvars

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 00:23 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> The Makefile overrides standard envvars that control the toolchain flags.
> This patch should set things right without reducing default behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Makefile.inc | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Makefile.inc b/Makefile.inc
> index 29c290a2..951d58fc 100644
> --- a/Makefile.inc
> +++ b/Makefile.inc
> @@ -90,11 +90,12 @@ OPTFLAGS	= -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wextra -Wformat=2 -Werror=implicit-int \
>  		  -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 $(STACKPROT) \
>  		  --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
>  
> -CFLAGS		= $(OPTFLAGS) -DLIB_STRING=\"${LIB}\" -DRUN_DIR=\"${RUN}\"
> +CFLAGS		?= $(OPTFLAGS)
> +CFLAGS		+= -DLIB_STRING=\"${LIB}\" -DRUN_DIR=\"${RUN}\"
>  BIN_CFLAGS	= -fPIE -DPIE
>  LIB_CFLAGS	= -fPIC
>  SHARED_FLAGS	= -shared
> -LDFLAGS		= -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now
> +LDFLAGS		+= -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now
>  BIN_LDFLAGS	= -pie
>  
>  # Check whether a function with name $1 has been declared in header file $2.

Hello Thomas,

I agree that we need a way to specify additional compilation flags. However, is
OPTFLAGS really a standard? Aren't most developers used to set CFLAGS to specify
additional compilation flags?

Bart.


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux