> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:29:42AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > By looking at the code, I don't see where the change in the reference counting > > could have caused this. > > The cause was the bug I identified in patch 3, not this patch. Oh, ok, because I could not figure an issue with this patch. I will send the fixing patch shortly. Best Regards, Elena. > > The regression is easily hit - tables that reference the same underlying device > more than once are very common. > > Alasdair -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
