I tend to agree with Xose this is unfair to set user_friendly_name in the hwtable entries.
Does anybody have a vote against my merging this patch ?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is up to sysadmins, and it is already off by default.
Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx>
---
libmultipath/hwtable.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libmultipath/hwtable.c b/libmultipath/hwtable.c
index 598b9b8..bef8d31 100644
--- a/libmultipath/hwtable.c
+++ b/libmultipath/hwtable.c
@@ -794,7 +794,6 @@ static struct hwentry default_hw[] = {
.prio_name = PRIO_ONTAP,
.prio_args = NULL,
.retain_hwhandler = RETAIN_HWHANDLER_ON,
- .user_friendly_names = USER_FRIENDLY_NAMES_OFF,
.detect_prio = DETECT_PRIO_ON,
},
/*
@@ -1133,7 +1132,6 @@ static struct hwentry default_hw[] = {
.pgfailback = -FAILBACK_IMMEDIATE,
.checker_name = TUR,
.fast_io_fail = 10,
- .user_friendly_names = USER_FRIENDLY_NAMES_OFF,
.prio_name = DEFAULT_PRIO,
.no_path_retry = 0,
.dev_loss = 60,
--
2.5.5
-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
