On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 08:12:31PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Seth Forshee > > <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:55:06PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:25:51AM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > > >> > > >> > Shortly after that I plan to follow with support for ext4. I've been > > >> > fuzzing ext4 for a while now and it has held up well, and I'm currently > > >> > working on hand-crafted attacks. Ted has commented privately (to others, > > >> > not to me personally) that he will fix bugs for such attacks, though I > > >> > haven't seen any public comments to that effect. > > >> > > >> _Static_ attacks, or change-image-under-mounted-fs attacks? > > > > > > Right now only static attacks, change-image-under-mounted-fs attacks > > > will be next. > > > > Do we *really* need to enable unprivileged mounting of kernel filesystems? > > What about just enabling fuse and implement ext4 and friends as fuse > > filesystems? > > Using the approaching Linux Kernel Libary[1] this is easy. > > I haven't looked at this project, but I'm guessing that programs must be > written specifically to make use of it? I.e. you can't just use the > mount syscall, and thus all existing software still doesn't work? > The projects includes a lklfuse program that uses fuse to mount a fileystem image. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
