On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:55:06PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:25:51AM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: >> >> > Shortly after that I plan to follow with support for ext4. I've been >> > fuzzing ext4 for a while now and it has held up well, and I'm currently >> > working on hand-crafted attacks. Ted has commented privately (to others, >> > not to me personally) that he will fix bugs for such attacks, though I >> > haven't seen any public comments to that effect. >> >> _Static_ attacks, or change-image-under-mounted-fs attacks? > > Right now only static attacks, change-image-under-mounted-fs attacks > will be next. Do we *really* need to enable unprivileged mounting of kernel filesystems? What about just enabling fuse and implement ext4 and friends as fuse filesystems? Using the approaching Linux Kernel Libary[1] this is easy. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/3/706 -- Thanks, //richard -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
