Sorry for raising this thread from the dead. My mail was sorted by sender rather than received time. Please ignore. On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:52:40PM +0100, Joe Thornber wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:18:22PM +0800, 梁文彥 wrote: > > In this experiment, we run out of the metadata, and by the "Allocated pool > > data" field, we infered that the maximum thin device was about 30.59TB, was > > it correct? > > Sounds about right. Use a bigger block size if you want to provision > more space in the pool. > > - Joe > > -- > dm-devel mailing list > dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
