On Aug 8, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:04:36PM -0400, Ed Cashin wrote: >> On Aug 7, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: >> >>> Immutable biovecs are going to require an explicit iterator. To >>> implement immutable bvecs, a later patch is going to add a bi_bvec_done >>> member to this struct; for now, this patch effectively just renames >>> things. >> >> Hi, Kent Overstreet. Thanks for Cc'ing me and for the promising work. >> >> Were you able to do sanity tests with aoe this time around? Last time, basic I/O was not working with the immutable biovec patches applied. >> >> Here is my 28 June email about my experiences with git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git at that time. It also includes information about creating an easy software-only aoe test environment. >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1505222/focus=1517924 > > Hey, thanks for testing it - sorry, I think I remember seeing that email > last time and got sidetracked before I got around to setting up some > tests. No worries. > I think I've got it working now, it's running the same stress tests I > use for bcache. Here's a fixed patch, I broke the aoe changes out into > their own patch since they were more involved than most of the others: I had added your git tree as a remote and checked out the for-jens branch. This patch conflicts with some of the changes in that patch, so I could use a pointer as to which base this new patch applies to. If it's already in some branch in linux-bcache, I can just use it there, and that's even more convenient. > (I am seeing a bug where it's getting stuck after running stress tests > for awhile, but I can reproduce that without the aoe changes too...) Just so I know what to look for, what does that behavior look like? I/O stops going and procs get stuck in disk sleep, maybe? Thanks. -- Ed Cashin ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
