Hello, Kent.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:10:42PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Heh. Well, in my view deleting stuff is good by default, and if you can
> delete things without user visible effects and without making the code
> more complicated...
>
> So I guess given the simplicity of this particular patch in the series
> I'm not sure what there is to justify here. Any suggestions on what
> would make sense to put in...?
So, what I would prefer to see is the justification of the whole
changes somewhere in the patch stream, so that patches can do,n
patch 1: update X to not use bi_destructor which will soon be removed.
patch 2: ditto for Y
...
patch N: bi_destructor is stupid because blah blah and after preceding
changes is no longer used. Kill it.
so that when one sees a patch in the series and wonders why the change
is being made, [s]he can follow the patch stream and understand.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
