On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 01:15:39PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 05/25/2012 11:25 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > This is prep work for introducing a more general bio_split() > > > > Change-Id: Ib9c4ff691af889d26bc9ec9fb42a2f3068f34ad9 > > > > > Since these patches will go through Jens tree this kind of > comment can *never* be true/correct. And it is plenty unwanted > for sure. That's from a gerrit hook, which I always forget to delete so I just disabled the hook on my work machine. Apologies. > Here: > bio_do means an operation on bio. But here we are actually operating > on a bio_pair. So rename it it to bio_pair_do. I don't follow what you mean by bio_do... but I think I get what you're after, comment wise. > > We will later introduce a real bio_split() function that receives > a bio and splits it. > > Or something like that. > Thanks > Boaz > > > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx> > > <snip> > > > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ struct bio_pair { > > atomic_t cnt; > > int error; > > }; > > -extern struct bio_pair *bio_split(struct bio *bi, int first_sectors); > > +extern struct bio_pair *bio_pair_split(struct bio *bi, int first_sectors); > > extern void bio_pair_release(struct bio_pair *dbio); > > > > extern struct bio_set *bioset_create(unsigned int, unsigned int); > > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel