On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 02:04 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > Only trouble is we lose the existing method of specifying the type of > the integer. Hi again Kent. My first suggestion to you was: --------------------- > or maybe yet another lib/vsprintf pointer extension > like %pD with some descriptors after the %pD for > type, width and precision. --------------------- For instance, internet addresses use pointer extensions %pI4 and %pI6 for ipv4 and ipv6 addresses. > New flag character would make much more sense... if gcc > could be persuaded. It can't be so persuaded though. Maybe a future gcc. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
