On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > But we are hashing fixed-sized blocks so there is no possibility of extension. If the first part of some block contains some security-sensitive data and the last part of the same block can be attacker-controlled, he can use the collision attack to change the security-sensitive data. > However, better safe than sorry. I guess we'll just have to deal with > backward incompatibility. So feel free to add my sign off to the new > patch also. > > Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Regards, > Mandeep > > > Mikulas I can introduce a switch to make it accept the old format. Do you want to? Mikulas -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
