[PATCH 2/2] blk-flush: fix invalid BUG_ON in blk_insert_flush

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A user reported a regression due to commit
4853abaae7e4a2af938115ce9071ef8684fb7af4 (block: fix flush
machinery for stacking drivers with differring flush flags).
Part of the problem is that blk_insert_flush required a
single bio be attached to the request.  In reality, having
no attached bio is also a valid case, as can be observed with
an empty flush.

[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-September/msg00154.html

Reported-by: Christophe Saout <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-flush.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 0ff29c6..720ad60 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	BUG_ON(!rq->bio || rq->bio != rq->biotail);
+	BUG_ON(rq->bio != rq->biotail); /*assumes zero or single bio rq */
 
 	/*
 	 * If there's data but flush is not necessary, the request can be
-- 
1.7.1

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux