On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:02:05 CDT, Will Drewry said: > I was just curious if there is any interest in pulling this change, or > if not, if there is any particular set of concerns, fixes, etc. Out of curiosity, how much of the stack does this end up eating? My root filesystem is already ext4 on an LVM partition that's on a LUKS/dm-crypt partition on a hard drive, and I'm sure somebody out there will have used xfs instead - and then exported it via NFS or something. Are we going to get weird stack overflows if people throw dm-verity into this sort of mix? > realize it's not a small amount of code to digest (though it is > smaller than the post from last year[1]). Would re-posting with an > added blob explaining the name be useful, Probably will need it to be merged, unless you set up an auto-reply that says "Patch rejected, 'verity' is *not* a typo for 'verify'" ;) I'll hopefully have some more comments over the weekend if I get some spare cycles.
Attachment:
pgptw6sr669A1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
